DrugLib.com — Drug Information Portal

Rx drug information, pharmaceutical research, clinical trials, news, and more


Nutrilib.com
A comprihensive source of nutritional information

Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B compared with conventional amphotericin B for induction therapy of histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS.

Author(s): Johnson PC, Wheat LJ, Cloud GA, Goldman M, Lancaster D, Bamberger DM, Powderly WG, Hafner R, Kauffman CA, Dismukes WE, U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group

Affiliation(s): Division of General Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin, MSB 1.122, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Philip.C.Johnson@uth.tmc.edu

Publication date & source: 2002-07-16, Ann Intern Med., 137(2):105-9.

Publication type: Clinical Trial; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: In patients with moderate to severe histoplasmosis associated with AIDS, the preferred treatment has been the deoxycholate formulation of amphotericin B. However, serious side effects are associated with use of amphotericin B. OBJECTIVE: To compare amphotericin B with liposomal amphotericin B for induction therapy of moderate to severe disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: 21 sites of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. PATIENTS: 81 patients with AIDS and moderate to severe disseminated histoplasmosis. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical success, conversion of baseline blood cultures to negative, and acute toxicities that necessitated discontinuation of treatment. RESULTS: Clinical success was achieved in 14 of 22 patients (64%) treated with amphotericin B compared with 45 of 51 patients (88%) receiving liposomal amphotericin B (difference, 24 percentage points [95% CI, 1 to 52 percentage points]). Culture conversion rates were similar. Three patients treated with amphotericin B and one treated with liposomal amphotericin B died during induction (P = 0.04). Infusion-related side effects were greater with amphotericin B (63%) than with liposomal amphotericin B (25%) (P = 0.002). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 37% of patients treated with amphotericin B and 9% of patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Liposomal amphotericin B seems to be a less toxic alternative to amphotericin B and is associated with improved survival.

Page last updated: 2006-01-31

-- advertisement -- The American Red Cross

We comply with
HONcode standard.
Verify here.
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site usage policy | Privacy policy

All Rights reserved - Copyright DrugLib.com, 2006-2008