Comparison of the effects of nicorandil versus verapamil on the incidence of slow flow/no reflow during rotational atherectomy.

Author(s): Iwasaki K, Samukawa M, Furukawa H

Affiliation(s): Department of Cardiology, Okayama Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan. iwasaki_k@kohjin.ne.jp

Publication date & source: 2006-11-15, Am J Cardiol., 98(10):1354-6. Epub 2006 Sep 29.

Publication type: Comparative Study; Randomized Controlled Trial

In rotational atherectomy, the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon is a common complication, which usually results in myocardial injury. We prospectively randomized 111 patients with successful rotational atherectomy into a verapamil group (group V, n = 56) and a nicorandil group (group N, n = 55). We compared final burr size, total ablation time, maximum decrease in revolutions per minute, incidence of slow flow/no reflow, creatine kinase-MB increase, and cardiac troponin T increase between the 2 groups. Patient and procedural characteristics were not significantly different between groups. The incidence of no reflow/slow flow was significantly lower in group N than in group V (3.6% vs 17.9%, respectively, p <0.05). The incidence of a minor increase in cardiac markers was also significantly lower in group N than in group V (creatine kinase-MB 3.6% vs 16.1%, p <0.05; cardiac troponin T 5.5% vs 21.4%, p <0.05). In conclusion, our results showed that nicorandil decreases the incidence of slow flow/no reflow during rotational atherectomy.