A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of topical tacrolimus 0·1% vs. clobetasol propionate 0·05% in childhood vitiligo.

Author(s): Ho N, Pope E, Weinstein M, Greenberg S, Webster C, Krafchik BR.

Affiliation(s): Section of Dermatology, Department of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada. nhung.ho@utoronto.ca

Publication date & source: 2011, Br J Dermatol. , 165(3):626-32

BACKGROUND: Both clobetasol propionate 0·05% (CP 0·05%) and tacrolimus 0·1% (T 0·1%) ointments have been shown to be efficacious and safe in treating vitiligo in the paediatric population. OBJECTIVES: To assess efficacy and safety of these two therapies compared with each other and with placebo. METHODS: In this prospective study, children aged 2-16 years with vitiligo, stratified into 'facial' (n = 55) and 'nonfacial' (n = 45) groups, were randomized into three arms: CP 0·05% ointment (n = 30), T 0·1% ointment (n = 31) and placebo (n = 29) for 6 months. Successful repigmentation, defined as > 50% improvement, was evaluated by comparing photographs taken at baseline and at 2, 4 and 6 months. RESULTS: In the facial group, 58% of the CP 0·05% group responded successfully compared with 58% of the T 0·1% group, and in the nonfacial group, 39% of the CP 0·05% group responded compared with 23% of the T 0·1% group (P > 0·05). There was a significant difference in response between the CP 0·05% group vs. placebo (P < 0·0001) and the T 0·1% group vs. placebo (P = 0·0004). Spontaneous repigmentation was evaluated as 2·4%. No significant clinical adverse events were noted in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Both CP 0·05% and T 0·1% ointments offer similar benefit in paediatric vitiligo, both facial and nonfacial. The facial lesions responded faster than the nonfacial ones.