Blood pressure lowering efficacy of potassium-sparing diuretics (that block the
epithelial sodium channel) for primary hypertension.
Author(s): Heran BS, Chen JM, Wang JJ, Wright JM.
Affiliation(s): Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. bsheran@ti.ubc.ca
Publication date & source: 2012, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. , 11:CD008167
BACKGROUND: Potassium-sparing diuretics, which block the epithelial sodium
channel (ENaC), are widely prescribed for hypertension as a second-line drug in
patients taking other diuretics (e.g. thiazide diuretics) and much less commonly
prescribed as monotherapy. Therefore, it is essential to determine the effects of
ENaC blockers on blood pressure (BP), heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse
effects (WDAEs) when given as a first-line or second-line therapy.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the dose-related reduction in systolic blood pressure
(SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ENaC blocker therapy as a first-line
or second-line drug in patients with primary hypertension.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2012), MEDLINE (1950 to
August 2012), EMBASE (1980 to August 2012) and reference lists of articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Double-blind, randomized, controlled trials in patients with
primary hypertension that evaluate, for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks, the BP
lowering efficacy of: 1) fixed-dose monotherapy with an ENaC blocker compared
with placebo; or 2) an ENaC blocker in combination with another class of
anti-hypertensive drugs compared with the respective monotherapy (without an ENaC
blocker).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias
and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. WDAE
information was also collected from the trials.
MAIN RESULTS: No trials evaluating the BP lowering efficacy of ENaC blockers as
monotherapy in patients with primary hypertension were identified. Only 6 trials
evaluated the BP lowering efficacy of low doses of amiloride and triamterene as a
second drug in 496 participants with a baseline BP of 151/102 mm Hg. The
additional BP reduction caused by the ENaC blocker as a second drug was estimated
by comparing the difference in BP reduction between the combination and
monotherapy groups. The addition of low doses of amiloride and triamterene in
these trials did not reduce BP. An estimate of the dose-related BP lowering
efficacy for ENaC blockers was not possible because of a lack of trial data at
higher doses.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: ENaC blockers do not have a statistically or clinically
significant BP lowering effect at low doses but trials at higher doses are not
available. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms
associated with ENaC blockers.
|