Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women
undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
Author(s): Fluker M, Grifo J, Leader A, Levy M, Meldrum D, Muasher SJ, Rinehart J, Rosenwaks
Z, Scott RT Jr, Schoolcraft W, Shapiro DB; North American Ganirelix Study Group.
Affiliation(s): Genesis Fertility Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Publication date & source: 2001, Fertil Steril. , 75(1):38-45
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and local tolerance of ganirelix
acetate for the inhibition of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women
undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
DESIGN: Phase III, multicenter, open-label randomized trial.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization (IVF) centers in North America.
PATIENT(S): Healthy female partners (n = 313) in subfertile couples for whom COH
and IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were indicated.
INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to receive one COH cycle with ganirelix
or the reference treatment, a long protocol of leuprolide acetate in conjunction
with follitropin-beta for injection.
OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rates, endocrine
variables, and safety variables.
RESULT(S): The mean number of oocytes retrieved per attempt was 11.6 in the
ganirelix group and 14.1 in the leuprolide group. Fertilization rates were 62.4%
and 61.9% in the ganirelix and leuprolide groups, respectively, and implantation
rates were 21.1% and 26.1%. Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were
35.4% and 30.8% in the ganirelix group and 38.4% and 36.4% in the leuprolide
acetate group. Fewer moderate and severe injection site reactions were reported
with ganirelix (11.9% and 0.6%) than with leuprolide (24.4% and 1.1%).
CONCLUSION(S): Ganirelix is effective, safe, and well tolerated. Compared with
leuprolide acetate, ganirelix therapy has a shorter duration and fewer injections
but produces a similar pregnancy rate.
|