Efficacy of corticosteroids for cancer-related fatigue: A pilot randomized
placebo-controlled trial of advanced cancer patients.
Author(s): Eguchi K(1), Honda M(2), Kataoka T(3), Mukouyama T(4), Tsuneto S(5), Sakamoto
J(6), Oba K(7), Saji S(8).
Affiliation(s): Author information:
(1)Department of Oncology,Teikyo University,Tokyo,Japan.
(2)Department of Gastroenterological Surgery,Cancer Institute, Ariake
Hospital,Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research,Koto-ku,Tokyo,Japan.
(3)Ginza Namikidori Clinic,Tokyo,Japan.
(4)Department of Cancer Palliative Therapy,Cancer Institute, Ariake Hospital,
Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research,Koto-ku,Tokyo,Japan.
(5)Department of Palliative Medicine,Osaka University,Osaka,Japan.
(6)Tokai Central Hospital,Kakamigahara,Japan.
(7)Translational Research and Clinical Trial Center,Hokkaido
University,Sapporo,Hokkaido,Japan.
(8)Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer,Tokyo,Japan.
Publication date & source: 2014, Palliat Support Care. ,
Objective: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and one of the most important
issues in palliative medicine, and it has been demonstrated to have a significant
impact on patient quality of life (QoL). The present pilot randomized controlled
study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of methylprednisolone (MP) for CRF in
advanced cancer patients. Method: Our study was planned as a randomized,
double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly
assigned to an MP group, who received 32 mg/day of MP orally for 7 days, and a
placebo group. The primary endpoint was an improvement in visual analog scale
(VAS) score for fatigue from baseline to day 7. The secondary endpoints were
improvements in appetite loss and QoL as well as evaluating the safety of
corticosteroids as palliative therapy. Results: It was not possible to complete
patient registration. In total, 35 patients were randomly assigned to an MP group
(n = 18) and a placebo group (n = 17). The mean changes in VAS score for fatigue
were -9.06 in the placebo group and -1.56 in the MP group, and for appetite loss
-6.44 in the placebo group and -8.06 in the MP group. In addition, there was no
evidence that methylprednisolone improved appetite loss or QoL compared to
placebo. The incidence of adverse effects was not greater in the MP group.
Significant of Result: We conclude that our sample size was too small to prove
the efficacy of methylprednisolone in improving fatigue. Our results were
reported as a pilot study performed to support a subsequent larger trial.
|