Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Data from Randomized Controlled Trials of Drugs Used to Treat Postherpetic Neuralgia (December).
Author(s): Edelsberg JS, Lord C, Oster G
Affiliation(s): < Brookline, MA.
Publication date & source: 2011-11-15, Ann Pharmacother., [Epub ahead of print]
OBJECTIVE:To conduct a systematic review of available data from reports ofrandomized controlled trials on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of drugs usedto treat postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), a common type of neuropathic pain.DATA SOURCES:The MEDLINE (1950-June 30, 2009) and EMBASE (1974-June 30, 2009) databases were used to identify source studies, in conjunction with a review of reference citations from identified published reports.STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:We selected all English-language reports of randomized placebo-controlled trials of the efficacy, tolerability, andsafety of drugs (oral or transdermal) used for treatment in patients with PHN. Studies with treatment duration less than 4 weeks were excluded. From each identified trial, we extracted information on (1) placebo-corrected percentage reductions in pain intensity from randomization to end of active treatment; (2) relative risks of withdrawal due to lack of efficacy; (3) relative risks of various adverse events; and (4) relative risks of withdrawal due to adverse events.DATA SYNTHESIS:Twelve reports of randomized controlled trials in patients with PHN were identified, involving 8 different agents (amitriptyline, capsaicin, divalproex sodium, gabapentin, morphine, nortriptyline, pregabalin, tramadol). Most studieswere small, involving fewer than 200 patients. Pain intensity was reported to have been reduced significantly with all drugs (range: 13.8% [tramadol] to 42.4% [amitriptyline]}; data were pooled using techniques of meta-analysis when information was available from more than 1 trial. No clinical trial reported a significant reduction in risk of withdrawal as a result of lack of efficacy. Analysis of adverse events was greatly limited by erratic and inconsistent reporting and wide variation in sample sizes.CONCLUSIONS:While available literature establishes the efficacy of 8 drugs in treatment of PHN, it does not provide adequate guidance as to which agents are best to treat this condition, in part because of inadequate reporting of data on tolerability and safety.