DrugLib.com — Drug Information Portal

Rx drug information, pharmaceutical research, clinical trials, news, and more



Understanding the effects of sildenafil treatment on erection maintenance and erection hardness.

Author(s): Claes HI, Goldstein I, Althof SE, Berner MM, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Symonds T, Schnetzler G

Affiliation(s): Department of Urology, University Clinics Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium. hubert.claes@scarlet.be

Publication date & source: 2010-06, J Sex Med., 7(6):2184-91. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

Publication type: Comparative Study; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to attain and/or maintain penile erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance. Although intuitively related, the link between erection hardness and erection maintenance has not been formally established and quantified. AIM: To understand the components of erection maintenance through statistical modeling. METHODS: Data from a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fixed-dose sildenafil (100 or 50 mg, 8 weeks) with open-label extension of flexible-dose sildenafil (100 and 50 mg, 4 weeks) were analyzed. Erection maintenance was assessed with item 4 (how often erection was maintained) or item 5 (difficulty in maintaining erection) of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Erection hardness was assessed with the Erection Hardness Score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Longitudinal modeling estimated mean treatment differences averaged over the double-blind phase for sildenafil 100 mg vs. placebo and 50 mg vs. placebo. Statistical mediation analysis was applied to partition the effect of sildenafil (pooled into one treatment group) on erection maintenance directly and indirectly through erection hardness. RESULTS: Longitudinal mean differences for sildenafil 100 and 50 mg vs. placebo were high (P < 0.0001 for each), with large standardized effect sizes (>0.8). Mediation modeling showed that sildenafil treatment affected maintenance directly as well as indirectly via erection hardness, when measured by IIEF item 4 (direct effect, 44.6%; indirect effect, 55.4%) or IIEF item 5 (direct effect, 56.9%; indirect effect, 43.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil treatment significantly improved erection maintenance, a physiologic requirement for satisfactory sexual performance. According to our model, only approximately half of the effect of sildenafil on erection maintenance was estimated to be driven through direct effects. Rather, the effect of sildenafil on erection maintenance seems to be substantially driven by erection hardness. Therefore, achievement of optimal initial erection hardness appears to be an important treatment goal for enhancing erection maintenance and achieving successful ED treatment.

Page last updated: 2011-12-09

-- advertisement -- The American Red Cross
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site usage policy | Privacy policy

All Rights reserved - Copyright DrugLib.com, 2006-2017