Does long-term losartan- vs atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment influence collagen markers differently in hypertensive patients? A LIFE substudy.

Author(s): Christensen MK, Olsen MH, Wachtell K, Tuxen C, Fossum E, Bang LE, Wiinberg N, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, Hildebrandt P, Rokkedal J, Ibsen H

Affiliation(s): Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. marina@dadlnet.dk

Publication date & source: 2006, Blood Press., 15(4):198-206.

Publication type:

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of losartan- vs atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment on circulating collagen markers beyond the initial blood pressure (BP) reduction. METHODS: In 204 patients with hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy we measured serum concentration of carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I procollagen (ICTP), carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and LV mass by echocardiography at baseline and annually during 4 years of losartan- or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment; 185 patients completed the study. RESULTS: Beyond the first year of treatment systolic and diastolic BP, LV mass index (LVMI) as well as collagen markers did not change significantly and were equal in the two treatment groups. Changes in PICP during first year of treatment were related to subsequent changes in LV mass index after 2 and 3 years of treatment (r=0.28 and r=0.29, both p<0.05) in patients randomized to losartan, but not atenolol. CONCLUSION: Long-term losartan- vs atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment did not influence collagen markers differently, making a BP-independent effect of losartan on collagen markers unlikely. However, initial reduction in circulating PICP may predict later regression of LV hypertrophy during losartan-based antihypertensive treatment.