Comparison between a sustained administration of carvedilol versus atenolol to reduce restenosis after coronary stenting.

Author(s): Cha KS, Kim MH, Kim JW, Kim DI, Kim HJ, Kim DS, Kim JS

Affiliation(s): Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, South Korea. kwangsoo@damc.or.kr

Publication date & source: 2004-02, Am Heart J., 147(2):E7.

Publication type: Clinical Trial; Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Carvedilol is a direct inhibitor of vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation through inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity and regulation of cell cycle progression. It produced an 84% suppression of neointimal hyperplasia in rat carotid angioplasty model, but no data are available regarding its effect on stent restenosis in patients. We tested whether a sustained oral administration of carvedilol reduces restenosis after coronary stenting in patients. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive either carvedilol (50 mg/d, n = 80) or atenolol (50 mg/d, n = 79) at least 1 day before stenting and continued on the same medication over a period of 3 months. The primary end point was angiographic restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis) at follow-up angiography. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic variables were similar between the carvedilol and atenolol group. The carvedilol dose was tolerable in most patients but reduced in 3 patients because of hypotension or dizziness. Angiographic follow-up was done in 137 patients (86%), and restenosis rate was not different significantly between both groups (17.1% versus 19.4%, P =.732). CONCLUSIONS: A sustained oral administration of carvedilol is not effective to reduce restenosis after stenting in patients. With carvedilol targeting regulators of cell cycle progression and having a profound neointimal inhibition with a high blood concentration in an animal study, further investigations with a stent-based delivery to achieve a high local concentration may be warranted.